Look who's endorsing Fan Fanatic Sports
Friday, July 31, 2009
All 104 Names need to be released
I smell the pigskin
July 31: 9:30am - 11:15am; 3:45pm - 5:30pm
August 1: 9:30am - 11:15am; 3:45pm - 5:30pm
August 2: 9:30am - 11:15am; 3:45pm - 5:30pm
August 3: 9:30am - 11:15am; 3:45pm - 5:30pm
August 4: 9:30am - 11:15am; 3:45pm - 5:30pm
Big Papi a Big Fraud
Thursday, July 30, 2009
PAC-10 preview: No horses for Trojans to fear this year
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
(As the college football season approaches, I will be breaking down each of the following conferences: The Big XII, the PAC-10, the Big East and the WAC. This week I tackle the PAC-10. If you haven't already, don't forget to check out past previews of Notre Dame and the Big XII.)
In 2008, Arizona State was supposed to be the team to knock USC off its pedestal. This year, there can be no such conversation made about any team in the PAC-10.
The freight train that is the USC football program will keep rolling. For those of you keeping score, no team has won more PAC-10 titles, shared or outright than USC. The Trojans have reigned as champions or co-champions for each of the last seven seasons, winning the league outright in three of those years. And there's no reason to think that it's nothing more than a matter of time until they capture their eighth-consecutive title.
For all the talk of how the loss of Mark Sanchez is going to hurt the offense, let's not forget that we're talking about a one-year starter on a program that makes a living off producing top-notch college quarterbacks. And the fact remains that while Sanchez is gone, the majority of the offense that was 11th in the nation in total offense is coming back. The quarterback situation will be one to watch as camp opens, but whoever takes the helm should be someone Trojan fans feel comfortable having under center.
The thing USC fans should be more concerned with is the defense. The second-ranked defense in the land last season returns just two members in 2009 - both in the secondary. USC will have to rebuild its entire front seven, so the unit that was the reason the Trojans were so dominant last year instantly becomes a question mark. Still, the offense still can be one of the best in football, so the defense doesn't have to be unstoppable for USC to find success.
Behind USC, there's a huge drop off with a few teams that should be pretty darn decent, but still have plenty of questions to answer and doubters to win over.
Cal could very well be the second-best team in the conference, thanks largely to early Heisman hopeful Jahvid Best. Best is coming off an outstanding 1580-yard season in which he averaged a whopping 8.1 yards per carry. But beyond him, the offense has a ton of uncertainties. The most compelling of those is whether or not Kevin Riley can shore up a quarterback position that was mired by inconsistency in 2008. The only way he and Best can be truly effective is if the offensive line is up to snuff and that unit is missing key pieces from last year's team. The Bears' strength lies in its defense, which returns eight starters, including a very strong and experienced secondary. Cal faces Oregon and USC back-to-back in its fourth and fifth games this season, so we'll know fairly early exactly where the Bears stand.
Oregon, who some believe is actually a better team than Cal and most certainly boasts a better offense, is also in the mix. Their offense is exciting and explosive with double-threat Jeremiah Masoli under center. LeGarrette Blount, who was one of two Duck rushers to top 1,000 yards last season, also returns. Oregon's problem, however, lies in the fact that the program returns the fewest number of starters of any team in the PAC-10 with five on each side of the ball. The defense is also a liability with a very weak secondary that ranked 111th in the nation in passing defense and doesn't figure to be much better this year.
Possibly the most interesting team to watch in the conference this year will be Arizona. They will have to do without Willie Tuitama's 3,000+ yards, 23 touchdowns and 65 percent completion rate and whoever wins the job has some huge shoes to fill. There are some decent weapons on the offense to help out whoever is decided on at QB, but the defense will have to win games. Arizona had a solid unit last year and has a dominating front four that could push the defense over the top and become a premier unit.
The team that will continue to toil is Arizona State. Last year's 5-7 disaster has to be considered the biggest disappointment in the program's history and one of the biggest in the history of the conference. With stars like Rudy Carpenter, Keegan Herring and Michael Jones, the offense still ranked 100th in the league. How well will they do now without those three? Odds are not very well.
Prediction: USC runs away with the conference with an 11-1 regular-season record. You could maybe consider the Trojans for a possible undefeated season, but with a tough week 2 test at Ohio State, followed later by road games against two other PAC-10 programs that want to prove their legitimacy (Cal on Oct. 3, Oregon on Halloween), there's a big chance for a hiccup.
PAC-10 Projected Final Standings
1. USC
2. California
3. Oregon
4. Arizona
5. Oregon State
6. UCLA
7. Arizona State
8. Stanford
9. Washington
10. Washington State
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Lee to Phils, VMart next to go?
Stay classy, Nomar. Stay classy.
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
Ok, I will preface this blog with this. I despise Nomar Garciaparra. There are no two ways about it. Even when he was here, I knew what he was - a tremendously talented baseball player with a bad attitude and a chip on his shoulder for all the wrong reasons. He wore the red, white and blue of the Red Sox like it was a burden instead of a privilege. And while he has always insisted he loved the fans in Boston and he loved the team, he never did anything to actually show it, leaving his words resoundingly empty.
For all intents and purposes, the yesterday's ceremony to retire Jim Rice's number was amazing, a moment that will stay etched in my mind forever. I really feel truly blessed to have been there to witness it.
But there was a brief moment where I felt nothing but disgust and sure enough, Nomar Garciaparra was in the middle of it.
For those of you who missed it, let me break it down for you.
After a brief introduction, Rice was introduced to the Fenway Faithful and made his entrance from the overhead door in left field, appropriately, and to a rousing ovation walked down the third-base line towards home plate, passing the Oakland dugout on the way. There were several players stretching and prepping for the game and as Rice passed them, Nomar jumped out in front of him with arms extended as if to say, "Come on, big guy, gimme a hug!"
Rice hugged him, but Nomar didn't let go and actually started rocking back and forth in an awkward exchange that looked like a pair of pre-teen middle schoolers dancing together for the first time at the school social.
Does it seem like much? Maybe not. But it's still a case of Nomar trying to insert himself in someone else's spotlight.
I have no problem with Nomar appreciating Rice and wanting to congratulate him. But how many current and former Red Sox players appreciate Rice and have congratulated him? Probably more than a few. How many of them did it in public, uninvited? One. Nomar wanted everyone to see him congratulate Rice. It would have been one thing if Rice made a point to go over to Nomar and give him a hug. It's the fact that Nomar went out of his way.
Maybe he couldn't stand to see the spotlight on someone else. Maybe it was one more way for Nomar to say, "See? I really do like Boston!" in his somewhat successful attempt to show the lemmings he cares and get their love back. Or maybe he and Rice are friends. I don't know their relationship.
But if they are friends, Nomar should have accepted that this was Rice's moment, stood to the side and let him have it. It's not like there wouldn't be other opportunities both inside the ballpark or outside to give Rice a hug, congratulate him, buy him a beer, whatever. And if he couldn't get a hold of him, Nomar could have called up his good buddy Lou Merloni and gotten hooked up.
It was Rice's moment. And it was an unbelievable one - one that I feel extremely lucky to have been there to see. But a part of me will always remember that moment where the man who couldn't stand to be here, couldn't stand the organization and didn't care about the fans made himself a part of history that honored someone who did all the things Nomar never did.
Stay classy, Nomar. Stay classy.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Vick on a short leash
Agatha Christie is a Jevan Snead fan; SEC preseason picks
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
OK, time to debunk this myth that Tim Tebow is a gift from the Gates of Heaven, and that 22 years ago in Jacksonville there was an Immaculate Conception.
But first, a little trivia...there are two things these guys all have in common. What are they?
-Rex Grossman
-Chris Leak
-Danny Weurffel
-Jesse Palmer
-Shane Matthews
-Kerwin Bell
-Brock Berlin
-Doug Johnson
-Ingle Martin
We in the world of sports media often joke, "must be a slow news week" when something trite, hackneyed or trivial gets blown out of proportion (see: Favre, Brett; Romo, Tony; James, LeBron). As corny as it sounds, this year's SEC Media Day was most definitely a "slow news week".
More specifically, I'm talking about two controversies surrounding Tim Tebow. The first one, in a rather comical moment, involves Tebow channeling his inner A.C. Green. When asked by reporter Clay Travis, author of "On Rocky Top" if he was saving himself for marriage (read between the lines, folks), his quick retort -- with a laugh -- was "Yes, I am...I think you're all stunned right now. I was ready for the question. Y'all weren't."
Of course, it was only a matter of time before the "hey, that's an unethical thing to ask!" wagon got rolling. People, it was a joke question, and it was deliberate through and through. Who cares? Get bent.
The second not-so-mini non-controversy was a whodunit caper. Apparently one of the 12 SEC coaches had the "galls" to pick someone other than Tebow as the first team Preseason All-SEC quarterback.
I, unlike some of our contemporaries in the biz, understand where the heat is coming from. With Lane Kiffin making his hatred of Florida so strong, and so public, the media thought that he was trying to stir things up again. But the story, as many SEC non-controversies tend to do, took on a life of his own.
Let us be reminded here that this is a college football media day gathering, not the sequel to "Gosford Park".
Every SEC coach was asked who he voted for as quarterback. When it turned out Steve Spurrier was the unholy one to commit such a sin, the southern media frig'n lost it. How could such a brash figure be so bold as to NOT agree that Tim Tebow is the best thing to happen to football since Teddy Roosevelt? I mean, this is only GOD'S GIFT TO FOOTBALL. The man preaches at state penitentiaries and does missionary work in the Phillipines. He even once breast-fed an injured flamingo back to full health. You son of a bitch, Steve, you!
Kidding aside, Spurrier handled the controversy about as smoothly as a jackhammer. Rather than man up and say, "Yes, it was me. I'm the one who voted for Jevan Snead, because he's a damn good quarterback who might be the No. 1 overall pick in next year's NFL Draft", he threw his director of football operations under the bus. In blaming his DFB for filling it out, he forgot the part where it's still HIS name on the ballot.
What I want to know, though, is why the media's double standard isn't being played up more. Three media members picked against Tebow for first team All-SEC (two for Snead, one for Arkansas' Ryan Mallett), yet nobody seems interested. I mean, wow, Mallett hasn't even won the starting job over Casey Dick, and somebody already wants to give him a crown? Who's voting in this thing, Roger Clinton?
Here's the truth that Tebow worshippers don't want to hear: he's not exactly a lock as the best quarterback even in his own conference.
Seriously.
Why is that such a hard pill to swallow?
Probably because historically, most Florida quarterbacks go on to endure mediocre careers in the NFL...which leads to my trivia answer. All of the aforementioned quarterbacks played at Florida within the last 15 seasons, and not one ever came close to making a Pro Bowl.
Tebow, coincidentally, may or may not project well in the NFL, depending on who you ask. Some believe his throwing motion needs to be tweaked out, and sped up, if he's going to be successful in the pros. Others feel he needs to improve on his accuracy -- the spread option, as Vince Young's career can attest, is not the greatest indicator of throwing ability. Others are skeptical as to whether he belongs at quarterback at the next level. Nobody, however, questions his leadership skills, which may lead to these misconceptions that Tebow is, in fact, God.
Snead, on the other hand, is almost a lock to go in the first 10-15 picks of next spring's draft if he chooses to forgo his final year of eligibilty. He has the tools to be a quality starter in the pros, with better mechanics, better zip on the ball, and a mean streak that rivals Tebow's. Some are even comparing him to another famous Ole Miss signal-caller -- Eli Manning -- minus the part about getting rattled and acting like a crybaby. Everyone sees him as a quarterback, and a starter, if and when he makes it to the NFL.
Not to mention, the Rebels delivered Florida its lone loss last season.
How's that for Deity?
***
The best and worst thing about covering the SEC is that Mike Finebaum and Gregg Doyel also cover the SEC. The good? Endless opportunities to have fun at somebody else's expense. The bad? I now have to read their columns.
I'll have a full breakdown later in the week, but for now let me throw my opinions on a couple other league issues, followed by my All-SEC first and second teams.
-- Sorry for being late to the ball game on this one, but Auburn's hiring of Gene Chizik as its new head coach is questionable -- but it's certainly not racist.
(Deadspin even speculated that Turner Gill wasn't hired because he's married to a white woman, another reason why I'd love to throw down hand-to-hand with A.J. "Classless Clown" Daulerio. I mean, look at this pipsqueak)
I think we take for granted how hard it is to win at Iowa State. First off, the northern Prairie is by no means a recruiting hotbed (which makes what Tom Osborne did at Nebraska all the more special). USC has Los Angeles. Florida has Florida. Texas has Texas. Michigan has Detroit. Notre Dame has Catholics across the country. What does Iowa have, farmers and cornstalks? And not to mention, all the decent in-state recruits end up in Iowa City, not Ames, by virtue of the Hawkeyes' rugged history. Recruting wise, there isn't enough talent to supply two major Division 1 programs.
Second of all, as a defensive coordinator Chizik won a national title in 2005 with Texas and was robbed of one in 2004 with Auburn. He clearly has an idea of what he's doing. Give him a supporting staff and he can make your defense nasty.
Third, Chizik has already assembled a Top 20 class for 2010. While I have no doubt Turner Gill would do very well recruiting in the SEC, what with his Texas roots and the amazing job he's done at Buffalo, Chizik clearly isn't bad, either.
In short, Chizik wasn't a racist pick. Just a safe one. Don't look too far into the racist undertones -- despite Chizik's tenure at Iowa State, he's more qualified than you'd think.
-- Memo to former Tennessee and UNC assistant Paul Gonnella: if you're reading this, call me. Seriously, ever since you left the Vols late last month for reasons still unconfirmed, you've been an absolute ghost. Where are you, Torah Borah?
For the uninitiated, let me warn you that I might be a little bit of a homer for Gonnella. When I was first hired to cover football at the Globe, he was a young, eager ball of energy heading a Cambridge High team that, in most years, is Godawful. Not to mention, being in the Greater Boston League you have to play Everett every year.
We immediately clicked, and over the fall he became one of my best sources and closest confidants. While other high school coaches had other commitments keeping them asleep at night like, oh, teaching, Paul and I were up til midnight, sometimes 1, chatting about all sorts of football-related stuff -- who's good, who's overrated, and why the spread is the greatest thing ever.
Gonnella ended up sending four kids D-1 in his three years there, including Josh Adams (UNC) and Ray Doucette (Bryant), before hopping aboard at UNC. I like to believe he also had a big hand in Catholic Memorial's Brennan Williams scratching Michigan off his official visit list and picking the Tar Heels.
He then came over this past January to Tennessee, and for some reason we started talking less and less. Word is he had a falling out with Lane Kiffin. And with that, Kiffin lost a good recruiting connect up here (not that there's much talent in Massachusetts to begin with, but still...I mean, they did offer Blake Barker from Wellesley last March).
So anyways, that's my friendship with Paul. But dude, if you're reading this, freaking call me.
Even if it's 2 a.m.
PRESEASON ALL-SEC PICKS
First Team Offense
QB - Jevan Snead, Jr., Ole Miss (Yep, I'm calling it)
RB - Mark Ingram, Soph., Alabama
RB - Chad Scott, Sr., LSU
WR - Julio Jones, Soph., Alabama
WR - AJ Green, Soph., Georgia
TE - Aaron Hernandez, Jr., Florida
C - Ryan Pugh, Jr., Auburn
OL - Maurkice Pouncey, Jr., Florida
OL - Mike Johnson, Sr., Alabama
OL - Ciron Black, Sr., LSU
OL - John Jerry, Sr., Ole Miss
ATH - Javier Arenas, Sr., Alabama
K - Joshua Shene, Sr., Ole Miss
First Team Defense
DL - Terrence Cody, Sr., Alabama
DL - Malcolm Sheppard, Sr., Arkansas
DL - Jermaine Cunningham, Sr., Florida
DL - Antonio Coleman, Sr., Auburn
LB - Brandon Spikes, Sr., Florida
LB - Rolando McClain, Jr., Alabama
LB - Jamar Chaney, Sr., Mississippi State
DB - Trevard Lindley, Sr., Kentucky
DB - Myron Lewis, Sr., Vanderbilt
DB - Eric Berry, Jr., Tennessee
DB - Chad Jones, Jr., LSU
P - Spencer Lanning, Jr., South Carolina
Second Team Offense
QB - Tim Tebow, Sr., Florida
RB - Michael Smith, Sr., Arkansas
RB - Bryce Brown, Fr., Tennessee
WR - Dexter McCluster, Sr., Ole Miss
WR - Brandon LaFell, Sr., LSU
TE - D.J. Williams, Jr., Arkansas
C - Ben Jones, Soph., Georgia
OL - Clint Boling, Jr., Georgia
OL - Mike Pouncey, Jr., Florida
OL - Lee Ziemba, Jr., Auburn
OL - Reilly Lauer, Jr., Vanderbilt
ATH - Brandon James, Sr., Florida
K - Leigh Tiffin, Sr., Alabama
Second Team Defense
DL - Geno Atkins, Sr., Georgia
DL - Carlos Dunlap, Jr., Florida
DL - Dan Williams, Sr., Tennessee
DL - Jeremy Jarmon, Sr., Kentucky
LB - Eric Norwood, Sr., South Carolina
LB - Micah Johnson, Sr., Kentucky
LB - Rico McCoy, Sr., Tennessee
DB - Joe Haden, Jr., Florida
DB - Major Wright, Jr., Florida
DB - Rashard Jones, Jr., Georgia
DB - Dennis Rogan, Jr., Tennessee
P - Chas Henry, Jr., Florida
Monday, July 27, 2009
Talking B's: Bay, Bard and Buchholz
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
Having a hard time remembering the last time Jason Bay had an RBI? Let me help you out. It was July 9. That's right folks, the man hs a big, giant goose egg in the RBI department since the All-Star break.
We all knew he wasn't going to keep up the ungodly pace he put up earlier this season, but this is an epic struggle like few we've ever seen.
His batting average was an impressive .324 in April and while he only hit .266 in May, he pounded 10 homers and 30 RBI. Even when he batted .230 in June, it didn't seem to be quite as big of a deal because he still knocked in 20. He was still productive.
But now it's reached the point where it's downright ugly. He's gone 12 straight without an RBI and over the last 30 days, he's posted an OPS of .616, putting him behind the likes of LA's Blake DeWitt and Casey Blake and San Francisco's Rich Aurilia.
Hopefully seing Oakland come to twon will help. In a very small sample size (11 games), Bay has done very well against A's pitching, posting a .385 batting average and 1.203 OPS (his highest OPS against any team).
Meet your new closer
Like what you've seen from Daniel Bard so far?
Let's hope so, because if he doesn't get traded, he very well could be the Red Sox' closerin the near future. Papelbon is under the Red Sox' control with arbitration eligible years in 2010 and 2011. He avoided arbitration this season with one-year contract, but rest assured he's going to be looking for more security.
With Jonathan Papelbon in the last year of his contract in 2012 and the Red Sox smartly not willing to issue a long-term, big-money contract to a closer, Bard appears to be the heir to the bullpen throne.
The Red Sox have made it pretty clear whom they wish to keep around, locking up the young talent they wanted to long-term deals last year. Papelbon was offerered no such deal, so the writing is pretty much on the wall. He wants top dollar on the marker and he'll most definitely get it, but not from the Red Sox. With the exception of a few (Mariano Rivera, Trevor Hoffman), the shelf life for a closer is not very long.
With what they've seen so far, they obviously appear confident to move on with Bard as Papelbon's replacement. The number have been pretty good. In 23 games (27.1 innings), he's posted a 2.26 ERA as well as bullpen bests in the form of a 1.01 WHIP and .184 opponent's batting average.
How he'll respond to ninth inning work remains to be seen, but with a fastball touching 100 and a nasty slider, he certainly has the raw talent.
Buchholz for the right price
Clay Buchholz, as it turns out, is available for trade.
While the answer was a resounding "No" when the Indians came calling offering Victor Martinez for Buchholz, according to some reports, the Red Sox may be willing to offer Buchholz as part of a package for Roy Halladay.
That package would ultimately shoot down my Bard-in-the-closer's-role theory, as it's said to also include Bard and a top-ranked prospect.
While it's all talk at this point, it does raise the question as to whether or not Buchholz, Bard and say a Michael Bowden or Lars Anderson would be too much for Halladay. In this case, the answer has to be no way. Halladay is one of the three best pitchers in baseball and instantly makes any team that acquires him better.
The real question now becomes would the Red Sox really have to give up that much? The main competition for Halladay has come from the Phillies, who are reportedly unwilling to part with both J.A. Happ and minor-league starter Kyle Drabek, who Charlie Manuel compared to Tom Seaver, even though he had Tommy John surgery last year.
Given the fact they would be trading within the division, the Red Sox probably will have to pay more than they usually would. But given the caliber of player they get in return, it just might be worth it and make them the front-runners in the American League.
Fantasy Baseball: Chin Music
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Despite offenseive woes, Sox get much needed win
Friday, July 24, 2009
NFL Draft will be different
Fantasy Baseball: Frozen Ropes
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Manny is money
Sox kick off trade season with insignificant trades
Now on to the acquisition of Chris Duncan. I do have to say the Red Sox are very lucky they got anything for Julio Lugo. If Duncan's head is on right, he can still hit home runs, but strikes out more than Adolpho Gonzalez at a Las Vegas Cat House. Duncan is 1 for his last 31 and has struck out 27% of the time in his career. Ouch!. What the Red Sox need is a more substantial bat to help stabilize this lineup. JD Drew is having another terrible season, Lowell has been hitting, but you never know how his hip will hold up, and When does David Ortiz fall back to earth and Jason Bay bust out of his funk?
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
What's the UFL all about?
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
It's still OU, Texas, then everyone else in the Big XII
By Chris Maza
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
(As the college football season approaches, I will be breaking down each of the following conferences: The Big XII, the PAC-10, the Big East and the WAC. This week I tackle the Big XII. If you haven't already, don't forget to check out last week's preview of Notre Dame.)
Sorry, all you Jayhawks, Cowboys, Huskers and Raiders.
The Big XII is still Sooner and Longhorn country.
While the Big XII will remain one of the most competitive conferences in college football and could possibly be even more competitive than last year, there’s no reason to think anyone but
Once again in 2009, you can’t have a conversation about the national championship without these two, who are considered by many to be the two of the top three teams in the country. Exactly where they rank is debatable, but one thing is clear – these two teams are clearly in front in a conference full of offensive firepower.
That fact statement in and of itself seems odd to say. Isn’t the Big XII supposed to be a rough-and-tumble conference dominated by defense? Well, times have changed and while several teams still have top-notch defenses, explosive offense is the name of the game.
And how can you talk about explosive offense without first mentioning Sam Bradford?
The Texas Longhorns felt last year they deserved to be in the Big XII title game last year and they might have had a valid point, having beaten the Sooners during the regular season. Instead, the Sooners broke a three-way tie in the South with the fifth tiebreaker and eventually won the Big XII championship and punched their ticket to the BCS national championship. This year,
Just because there are only two clear contenders for a national championship in the conference, does not mean the rest of the bunch is a collection of stiffs.
.
Texas Tech is replacing both Graham Harrell and Michael Crabtree, but it still runs a system that could make a boatload of quarterbacks very successful, making them still a very dangerous offensive team.
When it’s all said and done, it all comes down to the classic rivalry –
Prediction:
How much longer can the Smoltz experiment go on?
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
Time to reach for the panic button? It's just one of those things that Red Sox fans are always going to do.
And after five starts and a 6.31 ERA, fans have to be wondering if John Smoltz has anything left in the tank. After all, this was the guy who was supposed to provide stability to the rotation, especially with the abysmal start to the season by Daisuke Matsuzaka. He's been the exact opposite of that. Everytime you think he's figured it out, he falters again.
His first start against Washington was predictably shaky as he allowed five runs in five innings, but he seemed to rebound against a pretty decent hitting Baltimore club. He only pitched four innings, thanks to a rain delay, but allowed just one run on three hits.
Then the hapless A's got to him for five runs on 10 hits in six innings. He followed that up with his first win in a Sox jersey, giving up just one run in five innings to the Royals and the see-saw continued.
Last night's loss was possibly the most disheartening. Smoltz had allowed just one run on four hits through the first five innings, then totally blew up in the sixth. Three homers and an RBI single did him in as all of a sudden, the veteran lost control of the strike zone and didn't make it out of the inning. What's worse, this was a game in which they needed a good start from Smoltz. With the loss, the Red Sox dropped into a tie with the New York Yankees for first in the AL East.
So what to do with Smoltz? This question may be easier to answer if Brad Penny was throwing well. But how long can the Red Sox go with two pitchers struggling at the back end of the rotation as a pennant race is heating up? Does Terry Francona keep throwing him out there every fifth day and hope Smoltz finds his way?
The answer for the time being is yes.
I know that fans are clammoring to see more of Clay Buchholz after his "strong" start against the Blue Jays. But the fact of the matter is this: Buchholz did not seem to be any better at commanding the strike zone than he was in 2008 when he imploded. That's the difference between AAA and the Majors. Sure, he was ok. But he threw over 100 pitches and still didn't get through the sixth inning.
There are two things that have to make you think that Smoltz will come around. First, he is making hitters miss. In 25.2 innings, Smoltz has struck out 22 batters, a ratio that is just about on par with his career numbers. And let's not forget those are pretty good. Second, he's not walking anybody. He's around the strike zone. In five starts, he's only issued four free passes and for the first five innings of last night's game, he commanded the strike zone. Then he lost it.
But let's not forget that before June 25, this guy hadn't thrown off a Major League mound since June 2, 2008. Were you expecting miracles right off the bat? Why not give him a chance to get his legs back?
It's hard to remain patient when the Yankees have closed the gap, but it is still July. There's still 2 1/2 months of baseball left to be played and the Red Sox are still in a pretty good position.
Monday, July 20, 2009
Some love for Brookline
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
Brookline High football coach Laz Mitjans texted me this morning that his all-everything athlete Irvin Scott -- arguably one of the state's most underrated -- got an offer this weekend at Northeastern University's football camp. It's the first of what should be many.
Some of you Central Mass brethren may remember Mitjans from his days at Algonquin Regional, where he coached current UConn placekicker Dave Teggart. Now, the former Northeastern standout is in the midst of a tall task -- making Brookline football relevant again.
It hasn't been easy, but there is hope this year in the form of Irvin Scott, one of the nastiest all-around athletes east of I-495. The 6-foot-3 quarterback/wideout/running back/linebacker/safety/cornerback is sure to land at a Division 1 school -- FCS is a high possibility.
Don't believe me? Check this out.
Brookline hasn't been to a Super Bowl since 1994, when they got swiftly pounded by Chelmsford. But with a Bay State Herget division that should be as wide-open as it has been in several years, there is hope that the undermanned Warriors can make a run.
At the very least, they will be an entertaining group to watch.
Fantasy Baseball: Chin Music
Sunday, July 19, 2009
The Doc is most definitely in
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
You can't think about Roy Halladay and not be amazed. After all, this is the guy who went from the major leagues all the way back down to A-ball to try and re-discover how to pitch. Since then, he's only spent the last eight-plus seasons dominating major league pitchers.
There are few you'll find that pound the strike zone the way that he does. In that respect, he's the perfect pitcher to face a team like the Red Sox. Consider the number of "on-base percentage guys" Boston has. How many of their hitters rely on getting deep into counts , not swinging at bad pitches and forcing opposing pitchers to put one in their wheelhouse.
You can't do that with Halladay. Everything's around the plate and every pitch has a purpose. He doesn't waste pitches. He goes right after you. If you're hoping he's going to nibble around you a la Daisuke Matsuzaka, it's obvious you've never even looked at a stat sheet, nevermind actually watched him pitch.
Halladay just doesn't walk anybody. It just doesn't happen. The man has thrown nearly 2,000 major-league innings and has walked just 437 batters. Just let that sink in for a second.
Done?
Ok, now consider the fact that 163 of those came in his first three seasons (I'm not counting 1998 when he made two starts). So since 2002, he has allowed just 274 free passes, or 1.5 per nine innings.
Let's not forget he's tied for first with 11 wins, second in complete games with four, and fourth with a 2.73 ERA.
It's looking less and less likely that Halladay is going to be dealt, meaning that he'll spend another year on a losing club without a shot at a ring. It's disappointing to see one of the Top-3 pitchers in baseball toil in the mediocrity.
Friday, July 17, 2009
Buchholz Impressive in Season Debut
Brace, Patriots get deal done
Tough Titan: Training Camp getting closer
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Let's set the record straight on mid-majors
Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
All the hoopla about that Xavier kid dunking on LeBron has me thinking once again about this aberration I came across a while back.
Listen, I'm not taking a dig at Antonio Williams' credentials. When you've got experience scouting the NBA, you know what you're talking about when it comes to evaluating talent. Your words bear more merit than, say, chuckleheads like Skip Bayless or Jay Mariotti.
But where Williams, and a majority of the media, go wrong is in blanketly labeling any basketball team outside the six "power" conferences as a "mid-major". If anything, the fact that a kid from Xavier dunked on LeBron should show the masses that Xavier is a Top 25 program. Just look at their last three coaches -- Skip Prosser (1994-2001), Thad Matta (01-04) and Sean Miller (04-09) -- and remember that this team has been to two Elite Eights and three Sweet Sixteens since 2004. This is a program.
Yet some refuse to classify them as so, chalking it up to rolls of the dice and "good coaching". I fear Memphis will now be shed in a similar light, despite having one of the best young basketball minds in Josh Pastner.
The use of the term "mid-major" can be maddening, because its perspective is different amongst the eye of each beholder. Some people get it right, and count many basketball schools amongst its "major" category. Historically, because of such limited roster spots, basketball offers the most parity of any of the four major college sports. Many talented players slip through the cracks for reasons unknown -- see Elgin Baylor, Nate Archibald, Earl Monroe, Bill Bradley, etc.
Other writers -- primarily, the ones working for recruiting services -- seem to think any school not in one of the six BCS conferences is squabbling amongst the commonfolk for breadcrumbs. These are also the same people who think Alex Oriakhi is from New Hampshire, and every BC High kid lives in Dorchester.
Two years ago, when Rivals.com sent a mid-season award trophy to Xavier's athletic department for being the "best mid-major school", XU promptly refused to accept it. And rightfully so. How can you call Xavier, which has sent nine guys to the NBA in the last 15 years, a mid-major; and South Florida -- which might be one of the ten worst programs in Division 1 -- a high-major, strictly because they play in the Big East and XU is in the A-10?
South Florida might be the Dubai of college athletics (scrap of the Earth a decade ago, Deity in 2009), but they still out and out tank in basketball. You can make the same case about other "power conference" schools who haven't made a dent since the Clinton presidency.
I have a novel suggestion. If you have demonstrated a consistently competitive team at a high level, like Gonzaga or Memphis, then you are not a mid-major. If you’ve competed for a national title in the last 25 years, despite playing in a terrible conference – see: Louisville circa 1980’s, UNLV and Utah in the 90’s – and you haven't gone to shambles, then you’re still a high-major. Period. I don’t care if you play in Mid-Wach D. I actually have a whole argument on why the A-10 is not a mid-major, but that’s for a different day. Right now, let's set the record straight on mid-majors.
The following are examples of what AREN'T "mid-majors": Gonzaga, UNLV, Xavier, Memphis, BYU, Fresno State, Houston, UAB, Dayton, Utah, UMass, UTEP, New Mexico, George Washington, Rhode Island, Nevada, Saint Louis, Charlotte.
The following are examples of what ARE "mid-majors": Central Florida, George Mason, Rice, Davidson, Winthrop, Boston University, Southern Miss, New Mexico St., Siena, Manhattan, Oral Roberts, Butler, Creighton, Drake, Pacific, Wichita St., Holy Cross.
The following ought to be considered "mid-majors", because they are run like one: DePaul, Rutgers, St. John’s, Georgia, Northwestern, Nebraska.
Get the idea?
As for South Florida...the Bulls have made some splashes on the recruiting trail in the Northeast (see: South Kent), but the jury's still out.
I, for one, am not sold. Not until somebody dunks on Vince Carter.