Fan Fanatic Sports Staff
A chance to go 16-0 in the regular season, and the Indianapolis Colts are waffling over whether to start resting players.
Are you serious?
I just don't like the fact that they might not go for the perfect regular season and have a chance to run the table in the playoffs for a perfect season and Super Bowl title.
I know, you want your players rested for the playoffs. I get that.
But what I don't understand is that if you rest guys leading up the playoffs, you run the risk of getting stale -- timing could be off on both sides of the ball -- and that could come back to bite you.
What's the big plus of having fresh, healthy and well-rested players if they might not perform to their peak because of so much down time? I'd rather keep my players focused and don't change one thing because this Colts team is clicking on all cylinders.
Is it a grind? Of course it is. We all know it's a long season, but that's why you have a first-round bye, that should be your time to rest up.
The Colts have a chance to make history and first-year coach Jim Caldwell is undecided if the starters will play or for how long they play?
What a joke! If he starts resting guys, I hope they get bounced in the playoffs -- the Chargers could do that anyway.
Here's an idea: Play the starters and keep their mojo going, build up a big lead and then pull them and put the reserves in. See, you win the game and are able to give your No. 1 guys like Peyton Manning, Reggie Wayne and Joseph Addai some rest.
But don't go playing the game of "I don't know if they're going to play or not" BS, I hope that's just for media purposes.
I would love to see history in the making (well, if the Patriots eventually get knocked out of the playoffs), I think most of us would.
Do all football fans a favor Caldwell, play your guys like you've done all season. I bet your team wants to play for a chance at history, don't be that guy.
But if you are that guy, you're off Colts fans' Christmas card lists.
Your team better show up like the fans do every week.
No comments:
Post a Comment